On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Russ Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > I wrote 8i. If you keep poking around in contrib/rsc > you'll also find 86a and 86b which are different variants > of an 8086 assembler.
Ah, I'm sorry for miscrediting! I grabbed both 86a and 86b - it seems that some code is missing from 86a: main.c:52 reads "resolve const names". I only need really simple assembly, so even 86b (which seems to be simpler) should suffice. However, it seems that the code in 86b/inst.c has not yet been used with the rest of the program, so it doesn't do much more than just parse input (or whatever the job of y.tab.c is). In theory, with these I would simply get a binary file from the assembly, which I could then run on, say, dosbox in 8086 mode in Windows? Thanks, ak
