>to elaborate: group permission is not implemented by any >kernel file servers in the standard distribution.
And yet, it honors "others" permissions? I can set the r bit on others, and the cat then works... -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] on behalf of erik quanstrom Sent: Sat 10/16/2010 11:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [9fans] permissions On Sun Oct 17 02:02:07 EDT 2010, [email protected] wrote: > group membership checking is up to the particular file server. if it > doesn't implement it, it wont be enforced. to elaborate: group permission is not implemented by any kernel file servers in the standard distribution. only a few non-kernel filesystems bother with group ownership. all of them are fileservers that store files on disk (e.g. fossil, kenfs). in theory, one could, involve the auth server in the process, so that a user could use the auth serve to prove he's part of a group, but nobody's done anything like that yet. - erik
<<winmail.dat>>
