On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Charles Forsyth <[email protected]> wrote: >> things up with standard (as opposed to synthetic) file systems? > > why should a "synthetic" file system (actually they are all synthetic, i > think) > be considered not "standard"? i thought file systems were the common currency > in the system. >
correct, it seems to have caused confusion all around. Perhaps
s/standard/disk/g
-eric
