> > one interesting thing about that example is that if it were done again > for the Plan 9 environment, mk might well be even smaller, since > some of the existing functionality isn't really used, > or might be achieved by simpler mechanisms, or with functionality > added instead by further composition with other programs; > alternatively, it might be redone in a radically different way. > > How would you rewrite mk to be simpler?
Thanks, -- vs
