> Currently, if your processes have a common parent, you can use rfork; if > not, you must resort to #s. '#s' is a pretty unfortunate interface, > though...
okay, practicially speaking, what's wrong with #s, and what do you propose? - erik
> Currently, if your processes have a common parent, you can use rfork; if > not, you must resort to #s. '#s' is a pretty unfortunate interface, > though...
okay, practicially speaking, what's wrong with #s, and what do you propose? - erik