> > ('&', '&&', '||', if, '|', 'and '`{}') with something general
> > enough to replace mk, you'd be on to something.
>
> i did a mash-inspired version of mk as an inferno shell module once.
> it required no new syntax (although it could be confused by
> files named ":"...)what you did was very cool, but iirc this was in addition to, not replacing the standard && || ... bits. one could build pipelines and specify command order in one unified way, no? - erik
