On 15 February 2011 08:08, Fernan Bolando <[email protected]> wrote: > i have always considered 9atom and a few other independent plan9 stuff > as something similar to the openbsd release strategy. Theres a stable > release and a current. 9atom is more like openbsd-current it's > bleeding edge, but it should be _more_ stable and has _more_ hardware > support. The official iso is more like openbsd-stable unless something > is broken you will only see bug fixes, until bell-labs considers the > new stuff as stable.
This is near total misrepresentation of the OpenBSD release process.
