On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:11:35AM -0400, Russ Cox wrote: > > > All that Microsoft thinking (99.9%-thinking, if you find the other label > > offensive) to avoid adding a minute, one-off change to the Go runtime? > > It is not a minute, one-off change.
I stand corrected. > I don't know how to fix it to cope with tiny virtual address spaces > like those in 9vx. It's not something I anticipated when I wrote the > allocator, and it's not something I really want to spend time on > for such a tiny fraction of use cases. We have limited time. > We don't even support OS X 10.5 anymore. > That is as good an answer as I could possibly ask for. There will be other eyes to look at it and hopefully supplement the lack of time. A quick, uneducated question: should 9vx be investigated instead? > The best answer might be to make USTKTOP 1GB. > Where? Thanks for replying. ++L
