On Wednesday 03 of August 2011 15:16:00 erik quanstrom wrote: > i think the speed ratio of 2:1 is not correct. > > first, you must be assuming udma 133. i have never seen a udma 133 target. > http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=Property&Subcategory > =14&Description=&Type=&N=100007603&IsNodeId=1&srchInDesc=&MinPrice=&MaxPric > e=&PropertyCodeValue=359%3A7788 > > the fastest udma device i can find is udma 100. this is not 100mhz, it's > 100mb/s. where as 3.0gb sata is 3.0gb/s / 10 bits/byte = 300mb/s. > that's 3x, not 2x. (both are in decimal, as you can calculate from the > udma cycle time of 40ns, double-pumped). and of course sata 6.0gb is > 6x faster than pata.
thanks for the correction and please excuse my post; it was an early-morning brain-fart :^) -- dexen deVries [[[↓][→]]] For example, if the first thing in the file is: <?kzy irefvba="1.0" rapbqvat="ebg13"?> an XML parser will recognize that the document is stored in the traditional ROT13 encoding. (( Joe English, http://www.flightlab.com/~joe/sgml/faq-not.txt ))
