On Thu Sep 1 12:27:31 EDT 2011, [email protected] wrote: > will try as soon as possible. > > as far as i can see that patch limits the packet size for > the transfers to 8K no?
since each frame is 1ms, it would take a 64Mbit line rate to deliver 8k/frame. since by definition we're talking about usb1.1, i don't see how you could get >8k/frame. actually, i'm not sure how we could get over 4k/frame since 32Mbit >> 12Mbit. > any insights on why this has such an dramatic impact on > performance? paging in a virtual environment is teh suck without hardware assist. - erik
