> > that wasn't my reading of the spec. so you're saying that if > > the iterative algorithm loops 53 times, it's free to return any > > answer whatever and still be compliant? > > That was my reading (but it was a long time ago and I am not a > numerical analyst lawyer. So caveat emptor. You get what you > pay for. etc.) But if you expect to sell your library > presumably you'd care about the quality of impementation!
F00F! - erik
