> what do they do with nanosleep? Don't know, really.
> perhaps they are simply implementing a profiling system themselves > because the operating system might not provide a suitable one. This is Go, so I'm sure they are looking for a uniform approach. I guess they looked too hard? > perhaps plan 9 could provide a suitable one instead. > perhaps it already does. It seems that the model is Plan 9's prof, but I don't know this well enough to be the judge. Definitely, though, I'm reluctant to submit a Plan 9 variant as contrary to the way I understand the Go Authors to operate. Implementing nanosleep() does not require enormous resolution, although there are complications. ++L
