> sorry, i was misleading. i meant a 5c that does vlongs more directly, > not a 5c that does the new arm 64-bit operations. that compiler would > have a different name.
I seem to recall that ARM 64-bit emulation is one of Go's open TODOs. I think thie plethora of (sub-)architectures is terribly confusing, but it seems that what you have ought to be available, even if only for inspection. ++L
