> However, I don't understand what one should do if this log was removed > or somehow shortened (so that it does not mention the files' addition > anymore). Some such shortening is, I believe, reasonable, since after > say 10 years nobody is probably interested in all the files' changes. > But, if I understand, it is exclusively the log itself (i.e., not the > server database file A.db) that is used for synchronization by > replica...
read about compactdb, which is in replica(8). - erik
