On Mon Jan 16 13:03:20 EST 2012, [email protected] wrote: > that one's not inherently fatal, in the sense that it shouldn't stop the > search. > > On 16 January 2012 17:13, erik quanstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2. we're ignoring status codes that we should be treating as fatal (like > > Srvfail)
also, i forgot that it's possible to return Srvfail and return some RRs. these all need to be ignored. we weren't ignoring them in the past. - erik
