On Fri Jan 27 20:11:33 EST 2012, [email protected] wrote: > erik quanstrom <[email protected]> writes: > > > what's the practical advantage of having m hardcoded paths rather > > than n? does your sam -d edit complete a few microseconds faster? > > The idea is to eventually eliminate all hard-coded paths. Those files > that still contain them are either in lanugages alien to me (such as > troff), or pertain to platorms with which I am unfamiliar (such as OS > X). Hopefully, someone who's more familiar with those systems will be > able to snipe off the remaining 5 paths. Since it's all open source (or > at least well-defined), a hard-coded path count == 0 is theoretically > possible to achieve.
as you say yourself, that's an idea, the code still does the same thing. - erik
