That was my conclusion too. But it would be useful if it worked; ESX is somewhat common in larger IT/corporate environments since most servers (not in the Plan 9 sense) are usually idle.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:11 PM, erik quanstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't know, ESX seems really good, but it has its drawbacks. > > like conceptually being a much bigger moving part than running > a server for the purpose. seriously, you can have an atom server > for less than the cost of an esx license. > > having no other need for esx, of course. > > - erik >
