On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:19:52PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote: > > Does that translate into being able to supply an example of such a > "de-shitting" process the Go Team could and should have followed? An > irresistible paragon of building prowess? Something even the autoconf > people would be tempted to follow? >
You're still approaching this like it's some kind of pissing match. Understand that "we did this because it was easy and it works so whatever" is perfectly valid. Understand as well that it's also a non-optimal solution, and it's not been without its own problems. The root of the problem isn't that some magical man has to swoop in with all the answers all at once, it's that the core devs don't give a shit, which (again) is their prerogative.
