On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 09:54:34AM +0000, Balwinder S Dheeman wrote: > On 11/20/2012 03:42 PM, Steve Simon wrote: > >>How do you studiously not do something? Doesn't the imply working > >>hard at something? > > > >Indeed, everything I did read about Go made it look very attractive so I am > >ignoring it > >as I know myself. If I read more I will start to get annoyed that I am > >wasting my time learning C++ > >when Go is a much better solution. Its the sam reason I use plan9 and not > >Windows/Linux/OSX etc. > > > >its a backhanded compliment to the Go authors that I must not look at their > >work (yet). > > Me, OTOH, would like see Go go out of fashion ASAP; What's so > special a C/C++ programmer can't do what she/he can do with Go?
I find big wins in go, but I hope it will be still improved. The lack of header files is very nice, to mention only one big annoyance I see in C/C++. :) C/C++ don't have so fast (and ready) 'goroutines'. I hate writing state machines; let the per-goroutine-stack hold every state!
