It was changed in Ritchie's own compiler in v7 as I noted earlier. It was that, use long, or limit your sizeof'd data to half the 16-bit address space.
On 22 November 2012 11:54, Steve Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > I wish I had been in the standards meeting with a big stick when somone > suggested sizeof() returned an unsigned. > > No doubt somone will pipe up and explain why its a very good idea, but it > still annoys me.
