On Wed Nov 28 02:38:39 EST 2012, [email protected] wrote: > the relative unimportance of sleep? > > On 27 November 2012 23:19, erik quanstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > > why is sleep(2) limited in resolution to HZ in the > > portable code? the underlying mechanism is often > > much finer grained than HZ, and if there is a limit, > > one would think that it's related to the hardware > > mechanism, not the HZ clock. i'm clearly missing > > something.
that's not helpful. - erik
