On Tue Jan 22 16:43:14 EST 2013, [email protected] wrote: > > looks like you need the address of something that hasn't got one. > > for example for indirection, array indexing, etc. > > Ah, yes, taking the address of a volatile is a no-no it seems.
iirc, it should be allowed by the standard. but the mind boggles as to why a version control system would need it. :-) - erik
