On Mon Jan 28 18:51:38 EST 2013, [email protected] wrote: > On 28 January 2013 23:37, erik quanstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > > is the compiler free to assume that > > d2 has not been modified? > > It's free to do it, but whether it ought to is another matter. > Your specific example has appeared once before, but I can't remember > the context and resolution > (it might have turned up in Inferno). > > uvlong won't be stored in register(s) in your version of 5c, so it > won't behave the same way.
what's the cannonical clean way of getting away with punning? - erik
