On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Yaroslav <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2013/2/5 erik quanstrom <[email protected]> > looks good, but i'd do libsec at the same time. > unless you know of a compelling reason for these > to support a different set of algorithms? > > Agree. > > /n/sources/patch/x509-oids
I really think the APE variant should be picked up as a(n s)ed script in the mkfile. That way we can track a single x509.c file.
