Re: [9fans] doing a native awk port (was Re: Bug in print(2) g verb)

[Dan Cross]

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:31 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net>wrote:

> should i say "the current ot awk source"?  it's certainly not
>  designed for plan 9.
>

Regardless you are right that it is clearly not worth porting to 'native'
Plan 9 libraries or APIs; what, if anything, would be the benefit of such
an effort?

        - Dan C.