Re: [9fans] ISO C and typestr

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:03:00 -0700 

On 15 March 2013 16:52, Joel C. Salomon <[email protected]> wrote:

> BTW, the C11 standard includes a restricted form of 9c's anonymous
> sub-structs (with no pointer conversion).
>

isn't the pointer conversion most of the point of them?

Reply via email to