What about lack of makefiles and fast compilation times?, I don´t want to "remove" that. The point is making a more practical C, not a Go--. Go´s grammar is designed for being easy to parse (and is different), so it wouldn´t be C without punctuation symbols; and Go´s package system makes the compilation faster. What about the preprocessor? Can we get rid of that? If think if we can make better our lives, why wouldn´t do we? About the support, well is difficult to break our links with the past, but as a parallel long term project changing one thing at the time when it is ready would be possible to achieve stability and to write programs more easy.
2013/5/17, Skip Tavakkolian <[email protected]>: > Go's is a great language that makes it easy to write applications of all > sizes well, but its greatest benefit to Plan 9 is the plethora of packages > that make it possible to deal with the numerous Web standards. > > > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Matthew Veety <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On May 17, 2013, at 11:51, lamg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I think it will be nice for Plan9 having such language-compiler, Go >> > has proved to be an improvement over C in its own niche. >> > >> >> In its own niche is the important point here. Just because writing a >> kernel or system utilities can be done in Go doesn't mean it should be. >> Go >> isn't even totally stable or feature complete on Plan 9 at this point. >> You >> get the same shit in C on Plan 9 as you do Go plus it's more stable and >> has >> better support. >> At this point I would say keep using C unless you have some specific need >> to use Go on Plan 9. >> >> -- >> Veety >> >
