dexen deVries <dexen.devr...@gmail.com> wrote:
|On Wednesday 28 of August 2013 10:26:01 Erik Quanstrom wrote:
|> the claim that the devices are in the directories and thus the file system
|> is still false. even if explorer has some unnecessary code. and plan 9 is
|> not immune from unnecessary weird bits e.g. the export protocol.
|
|a somewhat official specification confirms that -- by not listing those magic
|files as implied:
|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463084
|
|some more info:
|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365247(v=vs.85).aspx#file_and_directory_names
I've searched for something official for inclusion in my first
reply, but failed. So.. Hey.
|dexen deVries
--steffen
--- Begin Message ---
On Wednesday 28 of August 2013 10:26:01 Erik Quanstrom wrote:
> the claim that the devices are in the directories and thus the file system
> is still false. even if explorer has some unnecessary code. and plan 9 is
> not immune from unnecessary weird bits e.g. the export protocol.
a somewhat official specification confirms that -- by not listing those magic
files as implied:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463084
some more info:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365247(v=vs.85).aspx#file_and_directory_names
--
dexen deVries
[[[↓][→]]]
Take care of the luxuries and the necessities will take care of themselves.
-- L. Long
--- End Message ---
