On 2 March 2014 18:46, <[email protected]> wrote: > you'r right. the smartness of duppage() isnt really neccesary. we > can just leave the cache alone. when memory is low, newpage() will > uncache pages for us. >
I also ripped out all the swap stuff. Either I'm on a machine with at last a Gb or two of RAM, or it's embedded and there's no paging disk, or both.
