On 9 May 2014 16:29, erik quanstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > do you think that's perhaps worth leaving the > #define in as a temporary measure? >
but if you're working with arm, the existing union is fine as it is, so why not just leave it?
On 9 May 2014 16:29, erik quanstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > do you think that's perhaps worth leaving the > #define in as a temporary measure? >
but if you're working with arm, the existing union is fine as it is, so why not just leave it?