> personally, i preferred the big switch statement in cpurc. it scales > even to large installations, and has the advantage of being a little > easier to get an overview. and there's no need for a bunch of files
I think the argument is that it keeps as much as possible common across all users (who use the labs distro), and keeps the site specific stuff seperate - thus replica can overwrite the common files easily when part of that changes. I guess you could say that its a workaround for the lack of a merge option in replica/pull. I don't know if this is the real reason the ". config-a" files where added, but its how I saw it. -Steve
