On Mon Oct 27 00:22:36 EDT 2014, [email protected] wrote: > > @@ -1594,6 +1595,7 @@ > > static Ints7 oid_md4WithRSAEncryption = {7, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 1, 1, 3 }; > > static Ints7 oid_md5WithRSAEncryption = {7, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 1, 1, 4 }; > > static Ints7 oid_sha1WithRSAEncryption ={7, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 1, 1, 5 }; > > +static Ints7 sha256WithRSAEncryption ={7, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 1, 1, 11 }; > > static Ints7 oid_sha1WithRSAEncryptionOiw ={6, 1, 3, 14, 3, 2, 29 }; > > static Ints7 oid_md5 ={6, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 2, 5, 0 }; > > static Ints *alg_oid_tab[NUMALGS+1] = { > > @@ -1602,6 +1604,7 @@ > > (Ints*)&oid_md4WithRSAEncryption, > > (Ints*)&oid_md5WithRSAEncryption, > > (Ints*)&oid_sha1WithRSAEncryption, > > + (Ints*)&sha256WithRSAEncryption, > > (Ints*)&oid_sha1WithRSAEncryptionOiw, > > (Ints*)&oid_md5, > > nil > > The existing identifiers are prefixed with "oid_"; is there a reason > for leaving the prefix out?
you make a good point. - erik
