> On Nov 9, 2014, at 1:42 PM, erik quanstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > > the aside leads me to believe that there is something wrong with the segment > copy on fork. since the semaphore in question is in the data segment, > i'm going to guess that you're running the labs kernel, and you're hitting the > page caching issue we've seen before. does this happen on an atom kernel?
Only happens in the labs ARM kernel. The labs mips and 386 kernels work fine in this situation. -jas
