Kurt H Maier <k...@sciops.net> writes: > Your post advocates a > > (x) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante > > approach to social networking. Your idea will not work. Here is why it > won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular > idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state > before a bad federal law was passed.)
Hah, I like that. Is that an rc script? An m4 macro? An Acme plug-in? Where can I get that? > Your post advocates a TOP doesn't "advocate" anything; it poses a theoretical question and explores the benefits/drawbacks of a few potential solutions. > (x) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante Every problem is ultimately a technical problem. That's true whether you're building an OS, running for president, or trying to reach spiritual Nirvana. If any of these boxes were to be checked, I'd sure hope it'd be the "technical" one. :) > (x) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money Based on the boxes that you checked, I'm assuming your response was intended in jest, not meant seriously. :) So, I won't take time to address each of your points. If this assumption is incorrect, however, and you really do have such concerns, let me know, and I'll post a brief answer to each of the questions you raise. > (x) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it. > ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your > house down! Well, I'm happy at least you didn't check that last box! :D
