I used half closes to put go chans in the network for my weird chan based 
But the code works without such feature. 
Being just that, I dont know if it counts. 

> El 5 feb 2017, a las 5:39, Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> 
> escribió:
> yes, i'm still trying to find a real situation where this would be critical. 
> i asked go-nuts list for production examples at the same time as the start of 
> this thread. no answers yet.
>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 3:31 AM Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> it's also funny that the rationale seems to be to pass the same conformance 
>> test for Go that once had it added to Inferno so it would pass a Java test 
>> but it was never otherwise used for reasons already given, so I took it out 
>> again.
>> On 4 February 2017 at 10:11, Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> I did once have a use for this in an o/s of mine, in a sort of network pipe 
>> to servers, but it was so variably implemented by other systems (data was 
>> flushed, or not) I gave it up as not particularly useful in practice, except 
>> between two known systems that did what you wanted.
>> On 4 February 2017 at 09:58, Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> On 4 February 2017 at 01:56, Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> Shutting down the write-end (i.e. 'shut_wr'), should send FIN, and 
>> transition to Finwait1.
>> i'd make it a "read" or "write" parameter to the existing "hangup" message. 
>> older implementations that don't accept the parameter will give an error on 
>> the request because the current tcp.c doesn't accept a parameter

Reply via email to