On Mon, 4/1/19, Ethan Gardener <eeke...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > I remember hearing of some disadvantage to > walking directories, but can't remember what it was. > Could someone remind me, please? Perhaps there was > more than one, of course. Perhaps a performance trick > couldn't be employed? The only complaint I've had about walk was the expectation in the protocol that servers produce the list of Qids all the way down. That got in the way when experimenting with a server that used a hash table of full path names to speed the walk process.
BLS
