On 10/8/20, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So the big question, before I commit to something I may not be
>> competent to fix: what is recommended by those in the know?
>
> You've written a lot of text here, but none of it describes
> what exactly is flaky. I'd recommend describing the flakiness
> in more detail.
>
I'm sorry I didn't phrase what I wanted to know properly. I can tell
if 9front has a fixed version of ndb/dns or not myself, I know where
it is "broken". For social rather than technical reasons, I am more
interested in how compatibly the no doubt improved version of the
server has been altered.
I have at least a partial answer: (a) the updated server, compiled
under Labs (not quite legacy) runs pretty much identically - no
differences in operation that I could report and (b) the same
Bad rrattach magic: 0x60 - previous -0x21524542
message appears in the logs and causes an assert exception. Which is
what I have been unable to fix in the past. Or determine if it's
something I can fix by tidying up a very bloated network database.
That said, thanks to all who have replied to me, it has been
informative and encouraging.
Lucio.
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T4e8db4c94a81d90f-Mf8771780016e72fbfd4e9fc7
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
