yes but there is no benefit to do that On 1/5/21, Joe S <j...@lifesoftserv.com> wrote: > hiro: > The purpose of doing this was not to just access multiple parts of the > file. I was working off the quote below. Maybe a file server thats purpose > is to mux parts of another file sounded like fun. My thoughts are that you > could then transer thoes chunks on a single destination on seperate > connections. > > eg. > % mux -C 3 -F large.file > % tree. > ├── large.file > └── large.file.mux > ├── 1 > ├── 2 > └── 3 > > 1 directory, 4 files > > Like I said though still learning though. > > On Wednesday, 30 December 2020, at 12:20 AM, cigar562hfsp952fans wrote: >> There is, however, a very simple reason why this approach won't really > work: the fids for a file opened on one connection won't be recognized > by the server on the other connection.
------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te69bb0fce0f0ffaf-M4e51600cccb05b53aabb5783 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
