On 5/15/24 04:02, Lucio De Re wrote:
> I have asked precisely NOTHING and have only pointed out the consequences of
> omitting sources from the 9front distribution because it leads to undesirable
> divisions.
I'm just trying to correct the misinformation you stated.
When you call the decision to drop fossil "bad", your email reads as a
persuasive argument for why things should change.
I was in turn explaining why this is not happening, and if someone wanted that
to change what would need to happen.
>
> I do find it tiresome that you keep ascribing intentions to me that may well
> reflect precisely how YOU would feel and react in my position. I assure I am
> nothing like that and I'm sure my history on 9fans for the past 20+ years
> would reflect that. But then again, people have abandoned 9fans in the past
> for reasons not dissimilar from these; I can read the undercurrent ("because
> you are asking for other people to maintain your software for you for free"),
> I am not impolite enough to respond in kind.
Are your intentions not to persuade someone in the 9front world that fossil is
worth adding back to the system?
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tad3dc0c93039a7d2-M487e5306116b96ed7c5b7052
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
