Are you making changes? The website is currently broken via HTTPS. On Mon, 24 Mar 2025, 19:29 Skip Tavakkolian, <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that's expected, but it's an issue that should be fixed. > > As I understand it, the warning is because AES_128_CBC is susceptible to > Padding Oracle attack (depending on implementation) and when TLS only uses > RSA key exchange, it doesn't provide forward secrecy (interloper can > passively record then decrypt). > > There isn't anything on the site that would be worth the hacking trouble. > It is just static content and no JavaScript was (ab)used in any of it. > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025, 8:12 AM Willow Liquorice <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Just thought I'd mention that my browser does *not* like connecting to >> the IWP9 website. It's complaining about the site doing an "old-style >> (potentially unsafe) handshake" – SSL_ERROR_UNSAFE_NEGOTIATION. >> >> Is this a quick fix on either end? >> >> - Willow > *9fans <https://9fans.topicbox.com/latest>* / 9fans / see discussions > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans> + participants > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/members> + delivery options > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription> Permalink > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T6492d49f521453ea-Md5547dc8df967f3f936671d6> > ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T6492d49f521453ea-Mf88b450fdfa46eec52db1331 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
