Does anyone else find it annoying that they seem to use "plan9" and "9p" interchangeably in their code and documentation? Considering they've extended 9p yet again (to what they call 9p2000.W) I find there not much real "plan9" anywhere here.
Regarding the NT kernel bits, there was some DoS vulnerability found in that code so you can find some write ups which dig in a bit to how it works on the kernel side a bit more[0]. [0] https://www.mcafee.com/blogs/other-blogs/mcafee-labs/hunting-for-blues-the-wsl-plan-9-protocol-bsod/ On 5/19/25 22:56, Lucas Francesco wrote: > They didn't open source the windows part that makes 9p avaliable as NT kernel > file connection method tho :/ > > We're almost there /hj > > On Tue, 20 May 2025, 00:15 Skip Tavakkolian, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > MS has released WSL under the MIT license. Local file serving done by a > "plan9" file server over 9P. > > > https://blogs.windows.com/windowsdeveloper/2025/05/19/the-windows-subsystem-for-linux-is-now-open-source/ > > <https://blogs.windows.com/windowsdeveloper/2025/05/19/the-windows-subsystem-for-linux-is-now-open-source/> > > https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/tree/2.5.7 > <https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/tree/2.5.7> > > > *9fans <https://9fans.topicbox.com/latest>* / 9fans / see discussions > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans> + participants > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/members> + delivery options > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription> Permalink > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tb7c7cf129f7343ab-M4a04448f8bed0122449de350> ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tb7c7cf129f7343ab-Mf3a7ea77d75b2e6696bdcedd Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
