> I include data on the read performance vs. the > previous traditional-io version. The mmapped > version is on amd64/32GB freebsd, the traditional > on WD mycloud Ex2 (arm7/1G). > > [...] > > The arena partition resides on the mycloud, and is > served via nfs readonly to the amd.
what are you even testing here?? you're benchmarking venti between a local machine and a remote one with completely different cpu, ram and io paths, _while_ claiming that mmap is providing a 4x speed increase? this makes no sense! i dont understand this! how is mmap related to any of this?
