9fans  

Messages by Date

• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] Soekris 5501s (was kenfs) erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] Intel ICH7 AHCI erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers! Dave Eckhardt
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] Intel ICH7 AHCI cinap_lenrek
• 2008/02/24 [9fans] Soekris 5501s (was kenfs) geoff
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] New User (Experimentor only, non-programmer) philo
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] New User (Experimentor only, non-programmer) philo
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers! john
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] kenfs Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] New User (Experimentor only, non-programmer) Fazlul Shahriar
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers! lucio
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers! lucio
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] Intel ICH7 AHCI erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] New User (Experimentor only, non-programmer) philo
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] kenfs erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] New User (Experimentor only, non-programmer) Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] New User (Experimentor only, non-programmer) Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/24 [9fans] New User (Experimentor only, non-programmer) philo
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers! david jeannot
• 2008/02/24 Re: [9fans] kenfs Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers! lucio
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers! Lyndon Nerenberg
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers! lucio
• 2008/02/23 [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers! Lyndon Nerenberg
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] Intel ICH7 AHCI lucio
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] Intel ICH7 AHCI ron minnich
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] Intel ICH7 AHCI erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] Intel ICH7 AHCI cinap_lenrek
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] Intel ICH7 AHCI erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/23 [9fans] Intel ICH7 AHCI cinap_lenrek
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] plan9 httpd/pegasus on unix? Skip Tavakkolian
• 2008/02/23 Re: [9fans] plan9 httpd/pegasus on unix? erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/23 [9fans] plan9 httpd/pegasus on unix? lejatorn
• 2008/02/22 [9fans] kenfs erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] a challenge Charles Forsyth
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Anant Narayanan
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] a challenge lucio
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Small GCC steps... lucio
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] a challenge ron minnich
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] a challenge andrey mirtchovski
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] a challenge Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] a challenge john
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] a challenge Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/22 [9fans] a challenge ron minnich
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Small GCC steps... ron minnich
• 2008/02/22 [9fans] Small GCC steps... lucio
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Iruata Souza
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Douglas A. Gwyn
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Douglas A. Gwyn
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] ctags on plan 9 with acme-friendly tags Douglas A. Gwyn
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Douglas A. Gwyn
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Douglas A. Gwyn
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Douglas A. Gwyn
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Douglas A. Gwyn
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Douglas A. Gwyn
• 2008/02/22 Re: [9fans] GCC etc. Icarus Sparry
• 2008/02/21 [9fans] GCC etc. lucio
• 2008/02/21 Re: [9fans] Re: DoaC - the beagle has landed Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/21 Re: [9fans] Re: DoaC - the beagle has landed Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/21 Re: [9fans] Re: DoaC - the beagle has landed Eric Van Hensbergen
• 2008/02/21 [9fans] Re: DoaC - the beagle has landed Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/21 Re: [9fans] managing windows in rio ron minnich
• 2008/02/21 Re: [9fans] managing windows in rio lejatorn
• 2008/02/21 Re: [9fans] managing windows in rio Christian Kellermann
• 2008/02/21 Re: [9fans] managing windows in rio Mathieu L.
• 2008/02/20 RE: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? lucio
• 2008/02/20 [9fans] DoaC - the beagle has landed Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? hiro
• 2008/02/20 RE: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Benjamin Huntsman
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/20 [9fans] back in print: the elements of networking style (padlipski) ron minnich
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Russ Cox
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] authenticating local server Russ Cox
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] Improving programs like doc2txt erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 john
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Alexander Sychev
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] How to move to rc from sh/bash maht
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Kernel Panic
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Hongzheng Wang
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Iruata Souza
• 2008/02/20 [9fans] [OT] Sponsorship plea dave . l
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Federico G. Benavento
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Uriel
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Hongzheng Wang
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] How to move to rc from sh/bash erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Kernel Panic
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] How to move to rc from sh/bash Federico G. Benavento
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Hongzheng Wang
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] How to move to rc from sh/bash maht
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] Improving programs like doc2txt Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions maht
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] Improving programs like doc2txt maht
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions maht
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Kernel Panic
• 2008/02/20 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Gorka Guardiola
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Marc Cinq Brillant
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? andrey mirtchovski
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? lucio
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Iruata Souza
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] authenticating local server Skip Tavakkolian
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Iruata Souza
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? john
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? devrin talen
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Federico G. Benavento
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Iruata Souza
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Iruata Souza
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Martin Neubauer
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? john
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/19 [9fans] New to plan 9: what next? devrin talen
• 2008/02/19 [9fans] authenticating local server Steve Simon
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 john
• 2008/02/19 [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Hongzheng Wang
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Eric Van Hensbergen
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Hongzheng Wang
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] Google search of the day sqweek
• 2008/02/19 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Alexander Sychev
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Hongzheng Wang
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Skip Tavakkolian
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Skip Tavakkolian
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Insultant... Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Michaelian Ennis
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Michaelian Ennis
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Brantley Coile
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Uriel
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Andrew Simmons
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Brantley Coile
• 2008/02/18 [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Andrew Simmons
• 2008/02/18 [9fans] Insultant... Andrew Simmons
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Uriel
• 2008/02/18 [9fans] Re: Non-stack-based calling conventions Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions y i y u s
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Federico G. Benavento
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Installing Plan9 on a DEC Alpha Workstation LiteStar numnums
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions LiteStar numnums
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] ctags on plan 9 with acme-friendly tags Anthony Sorace
• 2008/02/18 Re: Page-aligned executables (Was re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions) Anant Narayanan
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Re: Booting problem after fresh install from 20080203 iso. Sander van Dijk
• 2008/02/18 Re: Page-aligned executables (Was re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions) ron minnich
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Federico G. Benavento
• 2008/02/18 Re: Page-aligned executables (Was re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions) Joel C. Salomon
• 2008/02/18 Re: Page-aligned executables (Was re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions) ron minnich
• 2008/02/18 Re: Page-aligned executables (Was re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions) Joel C. Salomon
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] ctags on plan 9 with acme-friendly tags balaji
• 2008/02/18 Re: Page-aligned executables (Was re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions) ron minnich
• 2008/02/18 Page-aligned executables (Was re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions) Joel C. Salomon
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Insultant... David du Colombier
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Eric Van Hensbergen
• 2008/02/18 [9fans] An unsuccessful attempt to install on Thinkpad T43 Hongzheng Wang
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Insultant... Axel Belinfante
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Insultant... Axel Belinfante
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Google search of the day Gorka Guardiola
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Google search of the day Douglas A. Gwyn
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] ctags on plan 9 with acme-friendly tags Fco. J. Ballesteros
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Anant Narayanan
• 2008/02/18 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Anant Narayanan
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Robert William Fuller
• 2008/02/17 [9fans] Insultant... Uriel
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Uriel
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] ld.com lucio
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] ld.com Russ Cox
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Bruce Ellis
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Chad Dougherty
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Charles Forsyth
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Uriel
• 2008/02/17 [9fans] Plan 9 featured in virtualizer review Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Anthony Sorace
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions erik quanstrom
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] ctags on plan 9 with acme-friendly tags Eric Van Hensbergen
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] ctags on plan 9 with acme-friendly tags Anthony Sorace
• 2008/02/17 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Eris Discordia
• 2008/02/16 Re: [9fans] ctags on plan 9 with acme-friendly tags Steve Simon
• 2008/02/16 Re: [9fans] ctags on plan 9 with acme-friendly tags ron minnich
• 2008/02/16 [9fans] ctags on plan 9 with acme-friendly tags Anthony Sorace
• 2008/02/16 Re: [9fans] Improving programs like doc2txt Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/16 Re: [9fans] Improving programs like doc2txt Lyndon Nerenberg
• 2008/02/16 [9fans] Improving programs like doc2txt Pietro Gagliardi
• 2008/02/16 Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions Brantley Coile

• Earlier messages
• Later messages