>> in a popularly used compiler (ie. 8[cal]) that might benefit other >> compilers (ie. k[cal])?
>It looks like 5[cal] will benefit, too, considering efforts going on for 5[cal] already is popularly-used, as is q[acl]
>> in a popularly used compiler (ie. 8[cal]) that might benefit other >> compilers (ie. k[cal])?
>It looks like 5[cal] will benefit, too, considering efforts going on for 5[cal] already is popularly-used, as is q[acl]