i would never have thought to put in a while loop there.
must have *fixed* some *bug*. there is no justification
for this behaviour. if 'f' is of type ptr to fn, then *f is of
type fn ... and it is an expression not a name. **f should
be illegal etc etc.
brucee
On 4/30/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PCC had a particularly aggressive disregard for indirections
> > in such cases. if 'f' was a pointer to a function then ...
> >
> > f();
> > (*f)();
> > (***************************f)();
>
> surely this is inevitable if f ≡ &f ?
