On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:50:58PM -0400, Russ Cox wrote: > > Why 'n' not defined as long? > > because long and int are the same so it really doesn't matter.
That's not a terribly great assumption to make, is it?
- Dan C.
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:50:58PM -0400, Russ Cox wrote: > > Why 'n' not defined as long? > > because long and int are the same so it really doesn't matter.
That's not a terribly great assumption to make, is it?
- Dan C.