*shouldn't* is not a scientific term. did we try something older that WORKED.
brucee On 5/12/05, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > while gs is often to blame, i doubt it is to blame > in this case -- he's using a postscript printer, so > gs shouldn't even be involved. > > russ > > On 5/12/05, Bruce Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > only a guess but i think gs is to blame. 15 years ago i spent a lot > > of time constructing a postscript page that would take 5 minutes. > > and that was a 68020 dinosaur engine. > > > > use an older gs or just wait ... and wait .... > > > > brucee > > > > On 5/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wonder if lp is waiting for something to time out. You might try > > > `lp -D' and see if that tells you anything. > > >
