> (I haven't heard from Doug Gwyn for a long > time) doug relied on the usenet->9fans part of the gateway to work. he hasn't posted since that stopped working.
i know this because i spotted his mails in comp.os.plan9 and notified him that they don't make it to the list. i asked in 9fans who the owner of the gateway is in order to get at least a couple of people's emails to make it back here, but i got no reply. doug does post, his last one in comp.os.plan9 is from the 4th of may. i'll take the liberty of quoting it here: ---- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i suppose it is a bad manner to #include foo1.h from within foo.h > is it? Not as such. If foo1.h defines the interface to some resources that foo.h needs, then it *ought* to be #included, so that the user of foo.h doesn't need to know implementation details. For example, if foo.h declares a structure maintained by functions in the "foo" package (also declared by foo.h) and that structure has a private member that is a Boolean flag, foo.h ought to be #including <stdbool.h> so that it can use the proper type for "bool". This is generic advice, and the Plan9 developers seem to disagree (for no good reason so far as I have heard). ---- to see all other posts authored by him: http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=group:comp.os.plan9+author:gwyn&start=0&scoring=d&num=10&hl=en&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=14&as_maxm=5&as_maxy=2005&safe=off&; andrey ps: sorry about the third person, douglas.
