It was a pragmatic decision (pun inteneded) in development of the new code. It would be wrong to break -w by adding the varargs code. It is now just a relic.
brucee On 5/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bitten by this in the past, i wondered if there was a good > reason why -F was separate from -w. are there many times when > you want warnings but want the compiler to ignore the varargs > pragmas?
