Yep. I stand corrected. thanks. But let's try first the simplest (unoptimized) version. If it works well for real usage, I prefer a simpler (slower maybe) version.
On 9/10/05, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Plan B usage shows that latency is the biggest problem. > > I admit that only in unions, but if you join N different file servers > > in a directory, and then you dup the latency, it may be a problem. > > A workaround is just not to join too many servers, but it's a workaround, > > not a fix. > > Of course, one could issue walks in parallel to all members > of a union and then you'd get rid of this particular problem. > And doing so would be easier in user space. > > Russ >
